|
Spanish investigators
have discovered Atlantis's archaeological evidences...
Atlantis = Iberia. Atlantis in Gibraltar
and Ibero-Morrocian. The Georgeo's theories
(I Part)
Extracts the Georgeo's theories an hipotesis. (Forum Atlantis-Rising
2001-2004)
Official website of the Georgeos's tehories (in spanish)
http://Atlantis.sitio.net
http://Atlantis.miarroba.com
http://Georgeos-Diaz.sitio.net
Spanish investigators have discovered
archaeological evidences underneath the sea, near the coasts of
Gibraltar, that could belong to the Atlantic civilization described by
Plato with the name of Atlantis and that the Greek philosopher located
exactly in front of the Columns of Hercules (Straits of Gibraltar), next
to the region of Gadeira (Cadiz, Andalusia) and of the Atlas (Morocco).
The first findings were made in the summer of the 2003. A report with
the preliminary results was made, they consulted to great experts of
reputation the International as George F. Bass and Cemal Pulak and the
report were sent to the authorities and competent organisms of Spain and
to UNESCO.
It has spent a year, and still no scientific institution has shown
interest to study the solid evidences discovered by the team of
collaborating explorers of the investigator and escriptólogo Georgeos
Diaz-Montexano, intellectual author of the theories that support these
discoveries on the identification of the kingdom of the Atlantis with
the Atlantic towns of the coasts of Iberia and Morocco.
It is the first time in all history that is discovered architectonic
rest and metal devices under the sea in a location that agrees in a 100%
with the descriptions offered by Plato on the geographic place where it
was the island and the Acropolis of the Atlantis.
Some investigators protest to have found Atlantis in other places of the
World like Jim Allen, that places in a so remote place of Gibraltar as
mountains of Bolivia, whereas Robert Samarst now is conceited to have
discovered the Atlantis near the coasts of Cyprus, but Sarmast has still
not discovered nor a single archaeological evidence, the only thing that
does since it initiated his expeditions is to show pretty drawings of
virtual maps recreated by knoll computers and natural geologic formation
that it interprets like rest of Atlantis buried by the marine bottom.
The Spanish investigator Georgeos Diaz-Montexano, the German Ulf Ritcher
and the Dutch Jonas Berghman are the only investigators who defend with
scientific rigor and adjusting to Plato's texts and many other authors
of the antiquity the only possible location of Atlantis: the one that
describes Plato, that is to say, near the Columns of Hercules
(Gibraltar), Gadeira (Cadiz, Andalusie, Spain) and the Atlas (Morocco).
The Georgeos Diaz-Montexano's equipment of collaborator is the unique
one who has shown the world submarine archaeological evidences that have
been analyzed by the experts and they have still not been possible to
recognize or to classify. These evidences are to depths that correspond
with the old level of the sea of several thousands of years before the
times of Solón and Plato.
It is paradoxical that the team of Spanish investigators has still not
demanded the discovery of Atlantis, in spite of being those that more
scientific evidences have and that nevertheless, Robert Sarmarst does
not matter to him to affirm to the world that already has discovered
Atlantis when the only thing that it has at the moment is not more than
a few natural hills and formation - until it demonstrates to the
opposite and a few virtual maps and recreations where it is
reconstructed what Sarmast thinks that must have, but that not yet
exists.
Robert Sarmast not yet has shown the world nor a single archaeological
evidence that is solid and worthy to consider, whereas Georgeos Diaz-Montexano
has shown to not one but several deposits with archaeological evidences
"sui generis" that would have to be object of study between the
scientists. Robert Sarmast has guided fundamentally by the speculations
of the book pseudo-religious of Urantia, whereas Jonas Berghman, Ulf
Ritcher, and in special, Georgeos Diaz-Montexano, prefers to guide
itself by the scientific and philological study of the oldest
manuscripts known Plato, and the scientific evidences contributed by
geology, oceanography, the paleogeography, the sismology and
archaeology.
Nevertheless, and against all logic, Robert Sarmast he is receiving,
probably the greater advertising support at level the International that
has never received a finder of Atlantis.
How can be explained these paradoxes?
Perhaps exists some false prejudice against
the inhabitants of Spain and Morocco?
+ information and related links:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1011563/posts
http://www.AtlantisDiscovery.com/news
http://DiscoveryAtlantis.sytes.net
http://usuarios.lycos.es/atlantisbook/
atlantis_news_georgeos_diaz.html
(Abstract Atlantis in Andalusia. Atlantis in front of Gibraltar.
Atlantis Iberian-Moroccian The Spanish newspapers and magazines
recognize the investigations of Georgeos Diaz-Montexano.)
+ info in:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1288578/posts
Antonio Beltrán (Madrid. 2004)
gadeiros@telepolis.com
Get Free Content at ContentMart.com
Return to
Atlantis Main Page
|
